H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Magdalena Rybarikova H2H: 0-1
Magdalena Rybarikova holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Rybarikova won the 2009 US Open second round 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Magdalena Rybarikova | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Magdalena Rybarikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |