Kai-Chen Chang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 0-1
Marina Erakovic holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2011 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | 6-4 6-2 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data | Jun 22, 2011* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,646 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,695 | 104 | 133 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #66 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #66 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 30 | 45 | 75 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 60 | 83 | 143 | 42.0% | 20 | 28 | 48 | 41.7% | 24 | 21 | 45 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 64.7% | 59.0% | 43.6% | 58.2% | 54.3% | 53.4% | 47.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 22/24 | 1.6 | 6.8 | 58.9% | 58.6% | 41.8% | 54.0% | 46.2% | 51.7% | 44.6% | 2007 | 5/6 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 56.9% | 62.4% | 42.7% | 39.4% | 61.3% | 54.4% | 41.8% |
| 20 | 2011 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 61.6% | 39.8% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 53.4% | 40.5% | 2008 | 29/33 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 58.8% | 68.1% | 47.4% | 54.2% | 45.7% | 59.3% | 40.8% |
| 21 | 2012 | 18/20 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 59.7% | 62.2% | 41.6% | 43.4% | 47.6% | 54.1% | 43.1% | 2009 | 11/11 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 57.0% | 64.8% | 38.5% | 56.9% | 55.6% | 53.7% | 40.2% |
| 22 | 2013 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 58.3% | 63.2% | 38.3% | 61.1% | 54.1% | 52.8% | 44.6% | 2010 | 9/9 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 61.1% | 62.6% | 41.2% | 53.6% | 51.8% | 54.2% | 37.6% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 18/19 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 63.9% | 65.5% | 44.4% | 59.2% | 39.3% | 58.1% | 42.5% |
| 24 | 2015 | 2/3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 62.9% | 55.7% | 48.8% | 62.9% | 52.6% | 53.0% | 47.3% | 2012 | 38/40 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 54.4% | 68.8% | 46.5% | 53.9% | 42.7% | 58.3% | 42.6% |
| 25 | 2016 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 7.1 | 57.2% | 62.9% | 41.9% | 56.2% | 48.6% | 54.3% | 47.2% | 2013 | 29/36 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 57.0% | 70.7% | 45.0% | 51.7% | 47.3% | 59.7% | 44.4% |
| 26 | 2017 | 11/11 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 57.6% | 55.9% | 34.9% | 51.1% | 38.8% | 46.9% | 39.9% | 2014 | 31/32 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 60.3% | 65.6% | 42.5% | 49.3% | 46.9% | 56.3% | 41.9% |
| 27 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 63.9% | 60.4% | 38.2% | 56.7% | 60.0% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 2015 | 21/21 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 61.0% | 66.3% | 50.9% | 53.1% | 41.0% | 60.4% | 38.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18/18 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 64.7% | 61.7% | 44.5% | 51.8% | 50.1% | 56.1% | 43.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10/10 | 2.0 | 5.6 | 57.0% | 65.1% | 39.1% | 48.2% | 43.8% | 54.1% | 36.1% |
| Career | — | 84/91 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 60.0% | 59.9% | 40.8% | 52.1% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 44.0% | — | 219/237 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 59.0% | 66.6% | 44.9% | 52.7% | 46.0% | 57.7% | 41.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1498 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.29 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1558 | 119.4 | -1.06 | +1.66 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +11 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.0 | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 1565 | 115.7 | -2.81 | +0.01 | 0.923 | 48.1% | +27 | -48 | +36 | 41.1% | -0.68 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–0 | — | -0.25 | 2007 | 1457 | 98.0 | -0.61 | -2.50 | 0.916 | 48.2% | +5 | — | — | 21.4% | -1.36 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.10 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1489 | 107.6 | -1.48 | -2.00 | 0.870 | 47.1% | +59 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.22 | 2008 | 1518 | 119.1 | +1.94 | -2.96 | 1.003 | 49.8% | -43 | +12 | +208 | 48.7% | -0.08 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | 99.1 | +1.05 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1579 | 117.3 | -2.25 | -0.69 | 0.939 | 48.7% | +62 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.47 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.04 | 2009 | 1514 | 108.9 | -1.10 | -1.98 | 0.869 | 47.5% | -38 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.92 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | -0.07 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1532 | 98.7 | -1.81 | -0.42 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +42 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.17 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 | 2010 | 1480 | 102.7 | -1.18 | -3.79 | 0.820 | 45.9% | -44 | — | +254 | 25.0% | -1.70 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.06 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1627 | 118.5 | +1.72 | -1.34 | 1.015 | 50.1% | -74 | — | +125 | 55.3% | +0.02 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–0 | — | +0.24 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1529 | 107.9 | -0.55 | -0.03 | 1.007 | 50.3% | +36 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2012 | 1584 | 114.0 | +1.58 | -1.34 | 1.023 | 50.5% | -11 | -33 | +124 | 44.0% | -0.37 | 9–6 (60%) | 5–3 (63%) | 104.2 | +1.89 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1603 | 113.2 | -1.35 | +0.69 | 1.031 | 50.7% | +29 | — | — | 41.2% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.28 | 2013 | 1670 | 123.7 | +2.86 | -0.04 | 1.101 | 51.9% | -29 | -101 | +64 | 53.0% | +0.21 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–4 (71%) | 106.7 | +0.26 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1537 | 106.9 | -5.20 | -1.20 | 0.751 | 43.4% | +36 | — | — | 17.4% | -2.39 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2014 | 1608 | 123.2 | -0.48 | -1.04 | 0.958 | 49.3% | +12 | -33 | +39 | 40.8% | -0.31 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.33 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1536 | 102.0 | -0.12 | -0.26 | 1.065 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | 2015 | 1542 | 117.9 | +1.24 | -2.64 | 0.961 | 48.9% | +77 | -39 | +69 | 44.7% | -0.23 | 2–7 (22%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.1 | -0.36 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1620 | 110.9 | +0.21 | -1.18 | 0.978 | 49.7% | -22 | +11 | +15 | 48.7% | -0.26 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.4 | +0.55 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1548 | 105.9 | -0.90 | -2.01 | 0.788 | 45.4% | +27 | — | — | 15.8% | -1.84 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.44 |
| Career | — | 1646 | 117.6 | -2.39 | -0.31 | 0.921 | 48.2% | +38 | -48 | +36 | 37.7% | -0.76 | 11–18 (38%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.4 | +0.74 | — | 1696 | 119.6 | +0.96 | -1.64 | 0.979 | 49.6% | -14 | -29 | +123 | 44.6% | -0.34 | 41–44 (48%) | 31–29 (52%) | 102.9 | +1.32 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Marina Erakovic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 18, 2015 | H2H |
| Ayumi Morita | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 26, 2015 | H2H |
| Barbora Strycova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 8, 2015 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 18, 2014 | H2H |