H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kai-Chen Chang vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 1-0

Kai-Chen Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kai-Chen Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kai-Chen Chang won the 2016 Kuala Lumpur first round 5-7 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kai-Chen Chang
Chinese Taipei Age 35 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kai-Chen Chang #153 5-7 6-2 6-1 Roberta Vinci #10 Match data Mar 3, 2016* R32 Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kai-Chen Chang #1,233 #82 808 1,646 32 59 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,921 320 290 52.5% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 5–5 50.0% #94 1,558 0 0 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 2010 9–15 37.5% #117 1,565 0 0 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 2011 1–8 11.1% #148 1,488 0 0 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,502 0 0
21 2012 9–11 45.0% #86 1,579 0 0 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2013 1–4 20.0% #621 1,531 0 0 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,622 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,575 0 0
24 2015 1–2 33.3% #134 1,529 0 0 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #131 1,602 0 0 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,584 0 1
26 2017 2–9 18.2% #219 1,536 0 0 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,664 0 2
27 2018 1–1 50.0% #401 1,536 0 0 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,818 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,775 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2012 44–28 61.1% #16 1,831 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,850 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,751 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2016 28–24 53.8% #18 1,719 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,608 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,627 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Roberta Vinci
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2011 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2012 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2013 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 7 8 12.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2016 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2017 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 18 11 29 62.1% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 25 14 39 64.1% 10 9 19 52.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 25 15 40 62.5% 16 5 21 76.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 22 16 38 57.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 23 17 40 57.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — 175 170 345 50.7% 101 83 184 54.9% 38 31 69 55.1% 6 6 12 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 479/595 of Roberta Vinci's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Roberta Vinci
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 9/10 1.0 4.1 64.7% 59.0% 43.6% 58.2% 54.3% 53.4% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 22/24 1.6 6.8 58.9% 58.6% 41.8% 54.0% 46.2% 51.7% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 9/9 1.7 4.6 63.3% 61.6% 39.8% 49.4% 42.5% 53.4% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 18/20 1.8 5.3 59.7% 62.2% 41.6% 43.4% 47.6% 54.1% 43.1% 2004 2/12 3.5 6.0 54.0% 52.5% 34.2% 54.2% 26.1% 44.0% 39.1%
22 2013 4/5 0.5 7.3 58.3% 63.2% 38.3% 61.1% 54.1% 52.8% 44.6% 2005 5/32 2.2 4.6 59.5% 57.8% 40.8% 62.1% 38.8% 51.1% 37.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 13/26 2.2 3.1 60.3% 61.8% 40.9% 56.5% 39.7% 53.1% 40.8%
24 2015 2/3 2.0 3.0 62.9% 55.7% 48.8% 62.9% 52.6% 53.0% 47.3% 2007 21/28 1.6 2.9 61.9% 60.3% 46.9% 51.2% 40.7% 55.0% 42.2%
25 2016 7/7 1.6 7.1 57.2% 62.9% 41.9% 56.2% 48.6% 54.3% 47.2% 2008 10/11 1.1 3.1 62.3% 60.5% 45.6% 45.6% 59.7% 55.0% 47.1%
26 2017 11/11 2.0 7.5 57.6% 55.9% 34.9% 51.1% 38.8% 46.9% 39.9% 2009 42/46 1.5 2.5 59.1% 62.6% 45.3% 54.1% 48.2% 55.6% 44.7%
27 2018 2/2 1.0 5.5 63.9% 60.4% 38.2% 56.7% 60.0% 52.2% 50.9% 2010 46/48 2.3 1.7 59.1% 60.5% 49.2% 52.3% 44.8% 55.7% 42.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 55/61 1.9 2.2 57.4% 65.2% 47.8% 53.6% 49.9% 57.7% 44.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 64/72 3.0 2.3 56.2% 66.8% 48.5% 56.0% 53.1% 58.7% 46.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 62/69 3.0 2.0 59.0% 64.8% 47.7% 57.7% 46.3% 57.9% 46.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 41/47 2.6 2.9 53.1% 65.0% 46.7% 55.4% 50.4% 56.4% 44.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 39/57 2.4 1.6 61.9% 63.8% 49.1% 50.3% 50.0% 57.9% 43.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 48/52 2.3 1.7 60.6% 63.9% 45.9% 53.4% 46.3% 56.7% 43.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 27/30 2.0 1.8 61.2% 60.7% 44.8% 48.6% 41.5% 54.7% 40.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 4/4 2.5 1.3 62.7% 59.7% 43.1% 65.0% 67.6% 53.7% 39.4%
Career — 84/91 1.6 6.0 60.0% 59.9% 40.8% 52.1% 47.1% 52.3% 44.0% — 479/610 2.3 2.2 58.7% 63.6% 47.0% 54.0% 47.9% 56.7% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Roberta Vinci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2009 1558 119.4 -1.06 +1.66 1.024 50.6% +11 — — 50.0% +0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.20 2001 1485 96.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0–1 — +0.48
19 2010 1565 115.7 -2.81 +0.01 0.923 48.1% +27 -48 +36 41.1% -0.68 3–7 (30%) 1–0 — -0.25 2002 1478 99.9 — — — — +62 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.60
20 2011 1489 107.6 -1.48 -2.00 0.870 47.1% +59 — — 27.3% -1.55 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.22 2003 1503 103.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 1–0 — -0.18
21 2012 1579 117.3 -2.25 -0.69 0.939 48.7% +62 — — 44.2% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -0.04 2004 1508 106.2 -1.92 -0.61 0.697 41.7% -7 -34 +121 39.3% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.44
22 2013 1532 98.7 -1.81 -0.42 0.946 49.0% +42 — — 25.0% -1.17 1–1 0–2 — +0.21 2005 1622 124.1 -1.45 -2.43 0.757 44.7% -68 -125 +118 50.0% -0.27 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 104.0 -0.41
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1576 114.9 -1.68 -1.84 0.869 47.1% -32 -53 — 40.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.35
24 2015 1529 107.9 -0.55 -0.03 1.007 50.3% +36 — — 33.3% -0.33 — — — -0.01 2007 1561 120.8 -0.41 -1.67 0.937 48.4% -41 +8 +148 42.2% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 96.1 -0.85
25 2016 1603 113.2 -1.35 +0.69 1.031 50.7% +29 — — 41.2% +0.18 2–1 (67%) — — +0.28 2008 1585 114.9 +0.77 +1.74 1.048 51.2% -57 -7 — 45.8% -0.08 1–1 — — -0.36
26 2017 1537 106.9 -5.20 -1.20 0.751 43.4% +36 — — 17.4% -2.39 1–0 1–1 — -0.21 2009 1665 136.6 +0.16 +1.03 1.008 50.1% -103 +34 +76 49.0% +0.10 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.7 -2.09
27 2018 1536 102.0 -0.12 -0.26 1.065 51.5% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.27 2010 1819 134.7 +0.73 -1.12 0.948 48.9% -39 -121 -80 54.6% -0.03 9–3 (75%) 9–3 (75%) 111.5 -2.49
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1775 135.8 +1.59 +0.80 1.056 51.2% -60 +21 +63 59.0% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 103.9 -0.43
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1832 144.5 +2.94 +2.39 1.122 52.5% +13 -119 +16 57.9% +0.71 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 102.8 -0.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1851 142.8 +2.57 +2.61 1.105 52.1% -29 +17 +6 60.2% +0.67 18–9 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.7 +2.38
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1713 131.6 +0.37 +0.72 1.024 50.4% -31 +121 — 46.2% -0.03 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 90.3 +0.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1751 136.1 -0.58 +2.38 1.042 51.0% +8 -27 -60 54.2% +0.18 10–13 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.9 +1.44
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1719 138.5 +0.67 +0.43 0.992 49.9% +36 -63 -24 52.1% +0.05 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +2.16
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1608 128.5 -1.05 -1.18 0.901 47.8% +12 +33 +88 36.2% -0.86 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1628 117.8 -2.45 -0.08 0.852 47.1% +51 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.09
Career — 1646 117.6 -2.39 -0.31 0.921 48.2% +38 -48 +36 37.7% -0.76 11–18 (38%) 9–8 (53%) 98.4 +0.74 — 1921 138.3 +0.89 +0.85 1.018 50.4% -19 -18 +49 51.4% +0.08 99–85 (54%) 67–61 (52%) 103.3 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.