H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kai-Chen Chang vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 0-1

Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2010 Strasbourg Open first round 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kai-Chen Chang
Chinese Taipei Age 35 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #50 6-3 3-6 6-4 Kai-Chen Chang #89 Match data May 19, 2010* R32 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kai-Chen Chang #1,233 #82 808 1,646 32 59 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0
18 2009 5–5 50.0% #94 1,558 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0
19 2010 9–15 37.5% #117 1,565 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0
20 2011 1–8 11.1% #148 1,488 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0
21 2012 9–11 45.0% #86 1,579 0 0 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0
22 2013 1–4 20.0% #621 1,531 0 0 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0
24 2015 1–2 33.3% #134 1,529 0 0 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #131 1,602 0 0 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2
26 2017 2–9 18.2% #219 1,536 0 0 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2
27 2018 1–1 50.0% #401 1,536 0 0 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Virginie Razzano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2009 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2011 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2012 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2013 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2016 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2017 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Virginie Razzano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 9/10 1.0 4.1 64.7% 59.0% 43.6% 58.2% 54.3% 53.4% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 22/24 1.6 6.8 58.9% 58.6% 41.8% 54.0% 46.2% 51.7% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 9/9 1.7 4.6 63.3% 61.6% 39.8% 49.4% 42.5% 53.4% 40.5% 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3%
21 2012 18/20 1.8 5.3 59.7% 62.2% 41.6% 43.4% 47.6% 54.1% 43.1% 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7%
22 2013 4/5 0.5 7.3 58.3% 63.2% 38.3% 61.1% 54.1% 52.8% 44.6% 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7%
24 2015 2/3 2.0 3.0 62.9% 55.7% 48.8% 62.9% 52.6% 53.0% 47.3% 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1%
25 2016 7/7 1.6 7.1 57.2% 62.9% 41.9% 56.2% 48.6% 54.3% 47.2% 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0%
26 2017 11/11 2.0 7.5 57.6% 55.9% 34.9% 51.1% 38.8% 46.9% 39.9% 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8%
27 2018 2/2 1.0 5.5 63.9% 60.4% 38.2% 56.7% 60.0% 52.2% 50.9% 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0%
Career — 84/91 1.6 6.0 60.0% 59.9% 40.8% 52.1% 47.1% 52.3% 44.0% — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Virginie Razzano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38
18 2009 1558 119.4 -1.06 +1.66 1.024 50.6% +11 — — 50.0% +0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.20 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70
19 2010 1565 115.7 -2.81 +0.01 0.923 48.1% +27 -48 +36 41.1% -0.68 3–7 (30%) 1–0 — -0.25 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19
20 2011 1489 107.6 -1.48 -2.00 0.870 47.1% +59 — — 27.3% -1.55 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.22 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11
21 2012 1579 117.3 -2.25 -0.69 0.939 48.7% +62 — — 44.2% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -0.04 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44
22 2013 1532 98.7 -1.81 -0.42 0.946 49.0% +42 — — 25.0% -1.17 1–1 0–2 — +0.21 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
24 2015 1529 107.9 -0.55 -0.03 1.007 50.3% +36 — — 33.3% -0.33 — — — -0.01 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70
25 2016 1603 113.2 -1.35 +0.69 1.031 50.7% +29 — — 41.2% +0.18 2–1 (67%) — — +0.28 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98
26 2017 1537 106.9 -5.20 -1.20 0.751 43.4% +36 — — 17.4% -2.39 1–0 1–1 — -0.21 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77
27 2018 1536 102.0 -0.12 -0.26 1.065 51.5% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 117.6 -2.39 -0.31 0.921 48.2% +38 -48 +36 37.7% -0.76 11–18 (38%) 9–8 (53%) 98.4 +0.74 — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.