H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 1-1
Katerina Siniakova and Ana Konjuh are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on clay, while Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Siniakova won the 2022 Madrid second round 0-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Katerina Siniakova | 0-6 6-4 6-2 | Ana Konjuh | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2021* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ana Konjuh | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2016 | Doha | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Ana Konjuh | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |