H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Chloe Paquet H2H: 1-1
Katerina Siniakova and Chloe Paquet are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chloe Paquet leads 1–0 on clay, while Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chloe Paquet won the 2024 Roland Garros second round 3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Chloe Paquet | 3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(6) | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2022* | Monastir | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katerina Siniakova | 6-4 4-0 (ret.) | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Chloe Paquet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |