H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 0-2
Dominika Cibulkova holds a 2–0 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2017 Toray Pan Pacific Open fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017* | Toray Pan Pacific Open | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-2 6-2 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-2 6-0 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 |