H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-1
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Katerina Siniakova | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |