H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Kim Clijsters H2H: 1-0
Katerina Siniakova holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Clijsters in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Siniakova won the 2021 Indian Wells first round 6-1 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Katerina Siniakova | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Kim Clijsters | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Kim Clijsters | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 |