H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kiki Bertens vs Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik H2H: 1-1
Kiki Bertens and Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2012* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | 6-3 6-2 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | #1,168 | #59 | 972 | 1,601 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kiki Bertens | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #61 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #236 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #157 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |