H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 0-1
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Clijsters in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2020 Dubai third round 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2020* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-2 7-6(6) | Kim Clijsters | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |