H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kirsten Flipkens vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 2-3

Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 3–2 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2019 Hiroshima fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-3.

BEL Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
BEL Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 13, 2019* Hiroshima WTA 250 R16 Hard Alison Van Uytvanck #63 6-2 3-6 6-3 Kirsten Flipkens #114 Match data
Jan 31, 2019* St. Petersburg WTA 500 R32 Hard Alison Van Uytvanck #52 6-2 6-4 Kirsten Flipkens #55 Match data
May 24, 2018* Nurnberg WTA 250 R32 Clay Kirsten Flipkens #69 7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(2) Alison Van Uytvanck #46 Match data
Mar 4, 2016* Monterrey WTA 500 R16 Hard Kirsten Flipkens #73 6-2 4-6 6-3 Alison Van Uytvanck #47 Match data
Apr 11, 2015* Katowice WTA 250 QF Hard Alison Van Uytvanck #105 6-2 6-4 Kirsten Flipkens #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,829 198 221 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Alison Van Uytvanck #229 #37 1,355 1,765 119 147 44.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Alison Van Uytvanck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0 2011 1–2 33.3% #287 1,510 0 0
18 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0 2012 2–1 66.7% #199 1,554 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,498 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #112 1,524 0 0
20 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0 2014 10–17 37.0% #106 1,528 0 0
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,507 0 0 2015 19–18 51.4% #44 1,649 0 0
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,501 0 0 2016 4–13 23.5% #121 1,517 0 0
23 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,587 0 0 2017 8–7 53.3% #76 1,619 0 1
24 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,666 0 0 2018 18–21 46.2% #49 1,650 0 2
25 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0 2019 24–19 55.8% #47 1,713 0 4
26 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,762 0 1 2020 7–11 38.9% #64 1,663 0 4
27 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,734 0 1 2021 13–14 48.1% #58 1,752 0 5
28 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,657 0 1 2022 9–13 40.9% #72 1,679 0 5
29 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,657 0 1 2023 3–4 42.9% #344 1,682 0 5
30 2016 21–20 51.2% #65 1,642 0 1 2024 0–4 0.0% #229 1,607 0 5
31 2017 16–21 43.2% #74 1,695 0 1
32 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,660 0 1
33 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,747 0 1
34 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1
35 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,659 0 1
36 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,685 0 1