H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristina Kucova vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 1-1
Kristina Kucova and Stefanie Voegele are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stefanie Voegele leads 1–0 on clay, while Kristina Kucova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefanie Voegele won the 2016 Istanbul quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 36
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2016* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Stefanie Voegele | 7-5 6-2 | Kristina Kucova | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2016* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kristina Kucova | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Kucova | #1,375 | #71 | 899 | 1,696 | 40 | 68 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Kucova | Stefanie Voegele | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #147 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #245 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #259 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #175 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |