H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Kurumi Nara vs Oceane Dodin H2H: 2-0
Kurumi Nara holds a 2–0 lead over Oceane Dodin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kurumi Nara leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kurumi Nara won the 2016 Australian Open first round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 7-6 6-2 | Oceane Dodin | Match data |
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kurumi Nara | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Oceane Dodin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Oceane Dodin | #401 | #46 | 1,198 | 1,704 | 49 | 81 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kurumi Nara | Oceane Dodin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #154 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #74 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #306 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #91 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #121 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #111 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |