H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-0
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 1–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2016 Australian Open first round 6-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-7 6-3 6-3 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lara Arruabarrena | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |