H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 1-1
Lara Arruabarrena and Richel Hogenkamp are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richel Hogenkamp leads 1–0 on clay, while Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2018 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-1 6-2 | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2013* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Richel Hogenkamp | 6-3 6-3 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Richel Hogenkamp | #1,297 | #94 | 654 | 1,579 | 14 | 28 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lara Arruabarrena | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #132 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #106 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |