H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Pous-Tio vs Nastassja Burnett

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Laura Pous-Tio vs Nastassja Burnett.

Spain Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 0
0 main-draw meetings
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nastassja Burnett #392 6-2 6-4 Laura Pous-Tio #185 Match data Feb 13, 2016 Q1 Q Rio de Janeiro International modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Pous-Tio #776 #72 930 1,620 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nastassja Burnett #1,335 #121 524 1,545 8 12 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Nastassja Burnett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2005 7–7 50.0% #90 1,542 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #155 1,470 0 0
21 2006 6–14 30.0% #101 1,497 0 0 2013 5–7 41.7% #167 1,490 0 0
22 2007 3–6 33.3% #165 1,465 0 0 2014 3–2 60.0% #237 1,524 0 0
23 2015 0–1 0.0% #388 1,512 0 0
25 2010 6–6 50.0% #108 1,529 0 0
26 2011 13–15 46.4% #75 1,589 0 0
27 2012 6–9 40.0% #157 1,545 0 0
30 2015 0–1 0.0% #194 1,531 0 0
31 2016 0–4 0.0% #287 1,427 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Nastassja Burnett
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2014 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 6 6 12 50.0%
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 4 19 23 17.4% 37 40 77 48.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 8 13 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 71/89 of Laura Pous-Tio's and 18/20 of Nastassja Burnett's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Nastassja Burnett
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 —/— 2012 1/2 2.0 3.0 62.5% 56.7% 33.3% 60.0% 0.0% 47.9% 22.7%
21 2006 12/20 1.1 3.2 65.7% 58.4% 48.6% 56.2% 41.7% 55.0% 43.2% 2013 11/12 1.1 3.2 65.3% 61.2% 45.3% 51.6% 42.6% 55.6% 44.6%
22 2007 6/9 1.3 5.2 58.3% 53.0% 43.7% 48.0% 63.9% 49.2% 46.9% 2014 5/5 1.0 3.8 64.7% 55.9% 38.9% 45.0% 47.2% 49.8% 47.8%
23 —/— 2015 1/1 1.0 5.0 66.7% 67.5% 65.0% 62.5% 25.0% 66.7% 27.0%
25 2010 7/12 0.6 2.1 71.6% 57.1% 53.3% 52.3% 57.3% 55.3% 46.4% —/—
26 2011 27/28 0.7 2.5 67.4% 55.1% 47.8% 54.8% 53.1% 52.8% 46.5% —/—
27 2012 14/15 0.6 3.1 59.3% 61.5% 43.4% 55.3% 52.5% 54.0% 47.9% —/—
30 2015 1/1 0.0 2.0 64.4% 51.1% 61.5% 37.5% 50.0% 54.8% 34.3% —/—
31 2016 4/4 0.8 4.8 67.6% 54.9% 33.7% 40.6% 78.6% 48.2% 41.7% —/—
Career 71/103 0.8 3.0 65.1% 56.9% 46.7% 53.3% 53.8% 53.1% 45.8% 18/20 1.1 3.4 65.0% 59.8% 44.0% 50.8% 40.5% 54.2% 43.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Nastassja Burnett
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2005 1542 107.3 -41 +77 46.9% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 -0.14 2012 1471 95.3 -2.15 -4.83 0.436 35.9% 0.0% -3.50 +0.24
21 2006 1498 111.5 -0.72 -1.49 0.959 49.2% -43 +76 36.2% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 0–1 -0.11 2013 1490 104.3 +0.41 -0.43 1.005 49.7% +20 +31 42.3% -0.54 1–1 2–2 (50%) +0.78
22 2007 1466 95.5 -3.89 -0.40 0.924 48.0% +65 35.0% -0.80 1–1 2–4 (33%) +0.71 2014 1525 102.5 -1.99 +0.31 0.952 48.8% +32 53.8% -0.16 2–1 (67%) +0.33
23 2015 1513 96.4 -0.17 -1.04 0.810 46.3% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.14
24 2016 1512 96.0
25 2010 1530 117.0 -0.15 +1.25 1.039 51.0% +51 53.3% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–0 -0.42
26 2011 1590 119.1 -2.29 +2.09 0.985 49.8% -126 +36 44.3% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 100.5 -0.55
27 2012 1545 107.7 -1.22 -0.13 1.041 51.1% -104 +94 40.6% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.78
30 2015 1531 100.6 -1.68 -0.81 0.759 45.0% 0.0% -1.50 0–1 -0.03
31 2016 1428 94.0 -2.86 -3.40 0.805 45.3% -10 11.1% -2.22 0–1 +0.53
32 2017 1414 96.5
Career 1621 111.6 -1.76 +0.40 0.977 49.6% -75 +62 41.2% -0.42 13–20 (39%) 8–15 (35%) 91.7 +0.75 1545 99.5 -0.43 -0.50 0.945 48.5% +20 +31 40.0% -0.76 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 100.1 +7.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.