H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 0-1
Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2019 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Su-Wei Hsieh | 6-3 6-4 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Su-Wei Hsieh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |