H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:33 UTC
Leylah Fernandez vs Chloe Paquet H2H: 1-0
Leylah Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Chloe Paquet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leylah Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leylah Fernandez won the 2026 Abu Dhabi third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2026 | Abu Dhabi | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-0 6-3 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Chloe Paquet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |