H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Anna Blinkova H2H: 1-0
Lin Zhu holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Blinkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2023 Cleveland third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2023* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 6-0 6-3 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Anna Blinkova | 6-4 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2019 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anna Blinkova | #102 | #35 | 1,300 | 1,796 | 103 | 155 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Anna Blinkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #95 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #154 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |