H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Lauren Davis H2H: 0-1
Lauren Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2023 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lauren Davis | 6-3 6-3 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |