H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:33 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Mona Barthel H2H: 1-1
Lin Zhu and Mona Barthel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on grass, while Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2021 Wimbledon first round 6-7(2) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q3 | Grass | Lin Zhu | 6-4 6-3 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Lin Zhu | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-3 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |