H2H data updated: 2026-11-01 00:00 UTC

Lin Zhu vs Shuai Peng H2H: 0-3

Shuai Peng holds a 3–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2020 Shenzhen first round 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lin Zhu
China Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #108 6-2 3-6 6-3 Lin Zhu #71 Match data Jan 8, 2020* R32 Shenzhen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shuai Peng #132 6-4 7-6(5) Lin Zhu #115 Match data Sep 14, 2019* QF Jiangxi Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shuai Peng #32 7-6(2) 6-0 Lin Zhu #122 Match data Jul 29, 2017* QF Jiangxi Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lin Zhu #258 #31 1,464 1,805 89 117 43.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Shuai Peng — #14 2,825 1,908 301 264 53.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lin Zhu Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 2014 3–4 42.9% #134 1,520 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2015 4–6 40.0% #176 1,512 0 0 2007 19–18 51.4% #45 1,733 0 0
22 2016 5–5 50.0% #124 1,555 0 0 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2017 6–8 42.9% #113 1,578 0 0 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 2018 4–6 40.0% #120 1,546 0 0 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2019 5–14 26.3% #72 1,628 0 0 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2020 4–5 44.4% #91 1,605 0 0 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 2021 4–7 36.4% #114 1,563 0 0 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 2022 6–11 35.3% #84 1,592 0 0 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 2023 28–24 53.8% #37 1,742 0 1 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 2024 12–16 42.9% #120 1,656 0 1 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 2025 7–10 41.2% #168 1,680 0 1 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 2026 1–1 50.0% #258 1,647 0 1 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lin Zhu Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2014 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2015 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2016 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2018 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2019 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2020 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2022 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2023 24 19 43 55.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2024 9 9 18 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2025 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2026 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 80 93 173 46.2% 0 11 11 0.0% 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — — 209 177 386 54.1% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 202/206 of Lin Zhu's and 451/554 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lin Zhu Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 2014 6/7 2.7 5.5 50.3% 62.4% 46.3% 59.1% 49.5% 53.1% 43.0% 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2015 10/10 1.5 3.5 57.3% 60.4% 48.5% 50.0% 54.0% 55.4% 38.8% 2007 30/37 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2016 9/10 1.9 2.6 58.5% 63.5% 51.5% 60.6% 49.9% 58.4% 37.8% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2017 14/14 2.5 4.4 57.6% 67.5% 43.8% 48.6% 41.3% 57.3% 43.2% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 2018 10/10 1.3 2.5 60.3% 61.6% 44.3% 51.9% 52.1% 55.0% 44.2% 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2019 19/19 0.7 2.3 67.0% 54.9% 42.5% 40.5% 50.0% 50.7% 42.8% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2020 9/9 0.9 2.1 66.5% 60.0% 41.9% 49.2% 40.7% 53.8% 42.6% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 2021 11/11 2.2 3.5 64.9% 60.5% 45.0% 55.5% 52.6% 55.1% 46.1% 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 2022 17/17 1.1 2.2 65.0% 56.7% 44.0% 51.7% 46.9% 52.0% 40.1% 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 2023 51/52 1.5 2.5 65.3% 61.7% 48.4% 55.9% 51.0% 57.1% 43.5% 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 2024 28/28 1.9 2.7 59.4% 64.1% 46.4% 44.1% 42.3% 56.7% 42.0% 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 2025 16/17 1.8 2.4 66.8% 60.3% 45.2% 47.6% 45.8% 55.3% 44.3% 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 2026 2/2 0.5 0.5 73.6% 63.6% 47.9% 20.8% 40.4% 59.3% 46.4% 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
Career — 202/206 1.6 2.8 62.9% 61.2% 46.0% 50.5% 47.9% 55.4% 42.7% — 451/567 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.3% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lin Zhu Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 2014 1521 104.2 -1.07 -0.56 0.918 48.3% +15 — — 30.8% -1.46 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2015 1512 107.1 -1.28 -2.85 0.871 47.4% +26 — — 45.8% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.65 2007 1733 140.4 +2.14 +2.01 1.092 51.8% -35 +19 — 52.4% +0.41 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.5 -0.20
22 2016 1556 102.5 +1.20 -2.59 0.910 48.5% +14 — — 50.0% -0.59 1–1 — — +0.66 2008 1706 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -5 -19 -78 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.61
23 2017 1578 123.1 +0.74 -0.55 1.011 50.1% +11 — — 42.4% -0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 98.9 -0.01 2009 1774 142.7 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +15 -139 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 2018 1547 117.4 -0.29 -0.28 0.981 49.8% +12 — — 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.19 2010 1761 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +1 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 -1.67
25 2019 1628 126.1 -3.27 +0.44 0.867 46.7% +21 — — 32.4% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 97.3 -0.48 2011 1841 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -75 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2020 1606 108.9 -2.09 -0.72 0.923 48.0% +18 — — 47.6% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.71 2012 1708 129.3 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +14 +7 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.21
27 2021 1563 105.8 -0.33 +0.99 1.028 50.5% -6 — — 40.0% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.09 2013 1656 128.3 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 2022 1592 110.8 -3.24 -2.37 0.836 46.4% +24 — — 41.0% -0.77 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +1.08 2014 1747 135.1 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 2023 1742 140.5 +0.07 +0.82 1.014 50.3% -12 — -149 54.3% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.6 -1.61 2015 1702 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +35 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 2024 1656 126.9 0.00 -0.71 0.971 49.4% +61 -323 -13 48.4% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 93.5 +0.26 2016 1661 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +53 — +27 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 2025 1681 134.7 -0.52 +0.63 0.991 49.7% +20 — -87 46.2% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 -0.16 2017 1795 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -154 -48 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 2026 1648 108.9 -1.69 +0.78 1.140 52.1% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 — — +0.22 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
Career — 1805 129.0 -0.74 -0.30 0.956 49.1% +14 -323 -86 46.4% -0.35 25–38 (40%) 28–25 (53%) 98.2 +0.80 — 1908 141.0 +1.32 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +1 -48 -42 53.9% +0.30 86–95 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.