H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Linda Fruhvirtova vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 1-0
Linda Fruhvirtova holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Fruhvirtova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Fruhvirtova won the 2023 Charleston second round 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 21
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2023* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Linda Fruhvirtova | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Fruhvirtova | #184 | #49 | 1,050 | 1,721 | 41 | 53 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Fruhvirtova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #747 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2021 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2022 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2025 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2026 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |