H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:34 UTC
Liudmila Samsonova vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich H2H: 2-1
Liudmila Samsonova holds a 2–1 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Liudmila Samsonova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Liudmila Samsonova won the 2026 Brisbane fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-4 6-4 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2023* | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 7-6(4) 3-1 (ret.) | Liudmila Samsonova | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2022* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-1 6-3 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | #69 | #12 | 2,950 | 1,971 | 161 | 133 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liudmila Samsonova | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #129 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #20 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #27 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #17 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |