H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Madison Keys vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-1
Madison Keys and Saisai Zheng are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2019 Zhuhai round-robin match 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2019 | Zhuhai | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-4 6-2 | Madison Keys | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2015 | Zhuhai | WTA 500 | RR | Hard | Madison Keys | 6-3 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Madison Keys | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |