H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 0-1
Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2021 Madrid second round 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Saisai Zheng | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Magda Linette | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |