H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Bernarda Pera H2H: 0-1
Bernarda Pera holds a 1–0 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernarda Pera leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernarda Pera won the 2018 Guangzhou third round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2019 | Birmingham | WTA 250 | Q2 | Grass | Bernarda Pera | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Dec 28, 2018 | Brisbane | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 6-4 6-4 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Bernarda Pera | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Frech | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |