H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Cagla Buyukakcay
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Magdalena Frech vs Cagla Buyukakcay.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
TUR
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Cagla Buyukakcay | #373 | #60 | 980 | 1,613 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Frech | Cagla Buyukakcay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #126 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |