H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mandy Minella vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 0-1

Richel Hogenkamp holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richel Hogenkamp leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richel Hogenkamp won the 2017 Libéma Open first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Richel Hogenkamp
The Netherlands Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richel Hogenkamp #100 6-3 6-3 Mandy Minella #82 Match data Jun 15, 2017* R32 Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Richel Hogenkamp #1,297 #94 654 1,581 14 28 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mandy Minella Richel Hogenkamp
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 2012 1–1 50.0% #197 1,513 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2013 2–2 50.0% #213 1,524 0 0
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #138 1,530 0 0
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0 2015 2–7 22.2% #132 1,495 0 0
24 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0 2016 3–3 50.0% #133 1,548 0 0
25 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0 2017 5–8 38.5% #106 1,537 0 0
26 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0 2018 0–5 0.0% #167 1,514 0 0
27 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #195 1,478 0 0
28 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mandy Minella Richel Hogenkamp
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1% — 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 144/156 of Mandy Minella's and 40/42 of Richel Hogenkamp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mandy Minella Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 2.0 8.5 48.8% 65.9% 48.9% 56.3% 43.2% 57.0% 36.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/4 1.0 6.3 57.2% 55.4% 46.8% 57.9% 78.0% 52.0% 45.5%
22 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2% 2014 2/2 1.5 5.5 64.9% 56.6% 37.3% 55.0% 65.3% 50.3% 48.5%
23 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7% 2015 8/9 0.9 3.1 59.2% 60.5% 48.0% 55.2% 51.4% 55.8% 34.4%
24 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4% 2016 6/6 0.8 4.8 55.6% 63.8% 49.0% 61.8% 57.0% 57.1% 45.2%
25 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1% 2017 13/13 1.8 2.9 59.1% 62.5% 49.4% 47.9% 42.7% 57.2% 39.2%
26 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9% 2018 5/5 1.0 4.0 55.4% 55.2% 40.6% 47.6% 31.3% 48.4% 34.0%
27 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2% 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 61.5% 54.2% 43.3% 50.0% 42.9% 50.0% 43.3%
28 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5% — 40/42 1.3 4.1 57.8% 60.5% 47.0% 53.0% 49.0% 54.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mandy Minella Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1513 105.3 +0.72 -1.37 0.857 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — -0.17
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1525 101.1 -1.26 -0.60 0.947 49.5% — +62 — 44.4% -0.45 1–0 — — +0.05
22 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25 2014 1530 104.8 -1.97 -1.72 0.975 49.3% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
23 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07 2015 1496 108.3 -1.68 -2.17 0.778 45.4% -26 +70 — 26.3% -1.68 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.22
24 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 2016 1549 112.0 -0.08 +0.20 1.052 51.5% — — — 57.1% +0.50 0–2 — — -0.05
25 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53 2017 1538 106.6 +0.40 -2.44 0.917 48.4% -45 — +57 39.3% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.12
26 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92 2018 1514 95.9 -2.74 -3.00 0.659 41.5% — +56 — 9.1% -3.36 0–1 0–2 — -0.20
27 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65 2019 1479 104.6 +0.93 +3.09 0.867 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
28 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11 2020 1482 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48 2022 1468 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20 — 1581 108.2 -0.69 -1.69 0.874 47.4% -39 +63 +57 35.9% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 0–8 (0%) 92.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.