H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Marketa Vondrousova vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 2-1
Marketa Vondrousova holds a 2–1 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marketa Vondrousova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marketa Vondrousova won the 2021 Luxembourg third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2021* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marketa Vondrousova | 6-2 6-3 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2021* | Chicago 1 | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Marketa Vondrousova | 6-1 1-0 (ret.) | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2019* | Budapest | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Alison Van Uytvanck | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Marketa Vondrousova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketa Vondrousova | #132 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,043 | 164 | 106 | 60.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marketa Vondrousova | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,961 | 1 | 2 | 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,890 | 1 | 2 | 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |