H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Marketa Vondrousova vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-1
Marketa Vondrousova and Saisai Zheng are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marketa Vondrousova leads 1–0 on grass, while Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2020 Doha second round 1-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2020* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Marketa Vondrousova | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2019* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Marketa Vondrousova | 6-2 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketa Vondrousova | #132 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,043 | 164 | 106 | 60.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marketa Vondrousova | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,961 | 1 | 2 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,890 | 1 | 2 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |