H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Martina Trevisan vs Kateryna Baindl H2H: 1-1
Martina Trevisan and Kateryna Baindl are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Martina Trevisan won the 2022 Budapest fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Martina Trevisan | 6-4 7-5 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2018* | Moscow River Cup | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kateryna Baindl | 6-3 6-4 | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Trevisan | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |