H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Martina Trevisan vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 0-1
Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 1–0 lead over Martina Trevisan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2021 Rome second round 0-6 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2021* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Yaroslava Shvedova | 0-6 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Trevisan | Yaroslava Shvedova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |