H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 22:32 UTC
Mirra Andreeva vs Lin Zhu H2H: 1-1
Mirra Andreeva and Lin Zhu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2025 Ningbo fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 19
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2025 | Ningbo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Mirra Andreeva | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mirra Andreeva | 6-2 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirra Andreeva | #5 | #5 | 5,751 | 2,131 | 125 | 51 | 71.0% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mirra Andreeva | Lin Zhu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #16 | 1,942 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #9 | 1,934 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #5 | 2,059 | 1 | 6 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |