H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Nadia Podoroska vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-0
Nadia Podoroska holds a 1–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Podoroska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Podoroska won the 2017 Bucharest third round 6-3 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2017* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nadia Podoroska | 6-3 2-6 6-1 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Podoroska | #471 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,762 | 53 | 78 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nadia Podoroska | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |