H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nao Hibino vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 0-1

Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 1–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2021 Chicago 1 first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nao Hibino
Japan Age 31 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Alison Van Uytvanck
Belgium Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Van Uytvanck #58 6-1 6-3 Nao Hibino #71 Match data Aug 25, 2021* R32 Chicago 1 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nao Hibino #228 #56 1,050 1,726 80 121 39.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Alison Van Uytvanck #229 #37 1,355 1,772 123 149 45.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nao Hibino Alison Van Uytvanck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–2 33.3% #287 1,510 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 2–1 66.7% #199 1,554 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 1–3 25.0% #112 1,524 0 0
20 2015 6–2 75.0% #66 1,559 0 1 2014 10–17 37.0% #106 1,526 0 0
21 2016 19–22 46.3% #94 1,639 0 1 2015 19–18 51.4% #44 1,647 0 0
22 2017 11–17 39.3% #97 1,544 0 1 2016 4–13 23.5% #121 1,516 0 0
23 2018 5–10 33.3% #114 1,597 0 1 2017 9–8 52.9% #76 1,634 0 1
24 2019 6–5 54.5% #106 1,619 0 2 2018 19–22 46.3% #49 1,660 0 2
25 2020 9–6 60.0% #73 1,647 0 2 2019 24–18 57.1% #47 1,736 0 4
26 2021 5–17 22.7% #129 1,527 0 2 2020 7–11 38.9% #64 1,674 0 4
27 2022 4–6 40.0% #138 1,578 0 2 2021 15–15 50.0% #58 1,772 0 5
28 2023 9–12 42.9% #94 1,657 0 3 2022 9–13 40.9% #72 1,685 0 5
29 2024 4–16 20.0% #145 1,603 0 3 2023 3–4 42.9% #344 1,687 0 5
30 2025 2–7 22.2% #174 1,514 0 3 2024 0–4 0.0% #229 1,609 0 5
31 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,557 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nao Hibino Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2015 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 6 11 17 35.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2017 11 11 22 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2019 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2018 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2021 1 9 10 10.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2023 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2024 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2023 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
30 2025 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 83 148 43.9% 13 27 40 32.5% 2 11 13 15.4% — 85 90 175 48.6% 22 34 56 39.3% 16 25 41 39.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 180/195 of Nao Hibino's and 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nao Hibino Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 61.8% 66.5% 34.7% 49.3% 52.4% 54.4% 42.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 4.3 2.0 59.4% 63.4% 49.6% 61.1% 31.4% 57.9% 37.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 4/4 2.5 2.0 60.5% 56.2% 32.9% 46.0% 48.3% 50.4% 41.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 27/27 2.8 1.9 60.8% 63.0% 51.0% 51.3% 46.0% 58.1% 40.9%
21 2016 39/41 1.4 2.8 65.7% 58.2% 49.2% 50.1% 54.8% 54.9% 41.0% 2015 23/37 4.4 2.2 58.9% 64.4% 48.6% 53.1% 49.1% 57.9% 36.7%
22 2017 26/28 1.8 3.6 64.7% 58.6% 45.9% 54.7% 42.0% 53.9% 38.7% 2016 17/17 4.3 3.5 56.8% 67.4% 44.6% 54.9% 47.7% 57.8% 38.5%
23 2018 13/15 2.2 2.8 61.4% 60.0% 45.3% 59.2% 40.6% 54.4% 41.1% 2017 14/17 4.9 2.8 55.4% 69.1% 53.4% 64.4% 41.5% 62.4% 41.1%
24 2019 11/11 2.6 2.8 64.0% 64.7% 45.9% 56.5% 43.7% 57.7% 43.6% 2018 39/41 4.2 2.6 62.4% 65.5% 48.1% 61.6% 44.8% 59.2% 42.5%
25 2020 15/15 1.1 2.7 65.5% 62.6% 45.8% 52.9% 41.8% 56.6% 46.8% 2019 42/42 3.2 2.0 64.8% 63.0% 47.3% 55.8% 46.2% 57.4% 44.5%
26 2021 21/23 1.8 2.9 65.0% 55.1% 36.6% 39.9% 47.2% 48.2% 39.1% 2020 18/18 3.0 2.2 62.3% 66.6% 46.1% 47.0% 40.8% 58.7% 41.1%
27 2022 10/10 1.6 2.4 70.4% 59.9% 44.7% 43.5% 51.8% 55.2% 46.5% 2021 27/30 2.6 1.9 60.0% 63.1% 45.0% 54.3% 52.1% 56.0% 44.7%
28 2023 21/21 1.4 2.2 67.4% 58.0% 47.2% 47.1% 60.3% 54.4% 42.1% 2022 22/22 2.7 2.5 58.2% 64.6% 48.0% 60.7% 42.8% 57.8% 43.0%
29 2024 20/20 1.3 3.1 65.6% 55.3% 43.7% 48.7% 50.3% 51.1% 38.4% 2023 7/7 4.9 2.1 60.8% 65.7% 40.3% 59.0% 60.3% 55.8% 40.6%
30 2025 3/9 2.0 3.0 64.6% 58.9% 48.8% 52.8% 45.8% 54.6% 43.7% 2024 4/4 2.0 1.8 61.9% 50.4% 34.4% 43.3% 51.0% 44.3% 40.5%
31 2026 1/2 2.0 3.0 63.2% 68.8% 32.1% 71.4% 25.0% 55.3% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180/203 1.6 2.9 65.5% 58.6% 45.3% 50.1% 48.9% 53.8% 41.3% — 250/272 3.5 2.3 60.8% 64.4% 47.1% 55.7% 46.4% 57.7% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nao Hibino Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1511 108.0 -2.51 -2.37 0.928 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–2 — -0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1555 103.7 +2.11 -1.71 0.894 47.9% — +51 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 — — +0.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1524 90.5 -1.68 -1.92 0.831 45.8% — — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — +0.29
20 2015 1560 105.6 — — — — +14 — — 66.7% +0.60 1–0 — — +0.71 2014 1526 113.6 +1.00 -2.70 0.975 49.4% -8 +12 +42 43.3% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 92.5 +0.20
21 2016 1639 113.6 -1.11 -1.79 0.909 48.3% -18 -53 -78 44.0% -0.55 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 104.3 +0.05 2015 1647 123.7 +0.26 -3.01 0.870 47.5% -6 -88 -87 50.6% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 106.0 +0.57
22 2017 1544 109.2 -2.04 -3.51 0.840 47.2% +35 -50 — 39.0% -0.76 4–5 (44%) 1–1 — +0.77 2016 1517 106.5 +0.03 -3.82 0.912 48.2% +32 — -45 36.6% -0.90 0–7 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 92.1 +0.27
23 2018 1597 121.9 -0.94 -1.44 0.902 47.8% +21 — — 40.0% -0.87 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.36 2017 1634 121.0 +2.65 -1.27 1.095 51.6% +11 -34 — 55.3% +0.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 +0.26
24 2019 1619 112.2 -0.45 -0.48 1.031 50.5% +13 — — 45.8% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01 2018 1661 129.7 +1.86 -0.17 1.042 50.6% -23 -93 -60 46.9% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 97.5 -1.03
25 2020 1648 124.3 +0.36 +2.53 1.079 51.6% -35 -88 — 57.6% +0.73 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.20 2019 1736 130.4 +0.69 +0.82 1.044 50.9% -1 -93 -105 55.9% +0.33 9–4 (69%) 4–1 (80%) 107.5 +0.05
26 2021 1528 96.1 -6.17 -3.62 0.754 44.2% -45 -13 -10 22.7% -2.09 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 2020 1674 126.9 +0.77 -1.27 0.995 49.6% +24 -57 — 46.3% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.2 +0.13
27 2022 1578 112.0 -0.72 +0.28 1.038 50.9% -34 — — 47.6% +0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.93 2021 1772 134.7 -0.09 +1.01 1.015 50.6% +34 -271 -124 51.5% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -0.37
28 2023 1658 122.0 -1.96 -1.76 0.923 48.2% -9 — — 43.5% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 +0.98 2022 1685 128.7 +0.29 +0.04 1.018 50.4% -5 — +57 50.0% +0.19 0–8 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 86.9 +0.23
29 2024 1603 118.1 -4.14 -2.60 0.784 44.9% +36 -97 -114 28.6% -1.57 3–6 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24 2023 1687 120.1 -1.26 +0.60 0.919 48.7% -9 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.67
30 2025 1514 109.3 -1.77 -0.47 0.962 49.4% -11 +10 — 30.0% -1.65 0–2 — — -0.04 2024 1609 96.6 -3.25 -1.92 0.727 42.6% — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — +0.23
31 2026 1557 107.7 -0.02 +0.29 0.929 48.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 117.5 -2.08 -1.72 0.893 47.8% 0 -46 -68 40.3% -0.70 25–27 (48%) 18–19 (49%) 101.7 +2.42 — 1772 129.8 +0.64 -0.86 0.987 49.7% +4 -70 -50 48.1% -0.02 39–53 (42%) 28–44 (39%) 92.0 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.