H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Arina Rodionova H2H: 1-0
Nao Hibino holds a 1–0 lead over Arina Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nao Hibino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nao Hibino won the 2020 Hua Hin third round 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020* | Hua Hin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nao Hibino | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Arina Rodionova | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2019 | Tianjin | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Arina Rodionova | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Jan 2, 2017 | Auckland | WTA 250 | Q3 | Hard | Arina Rodionova | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Arina Rodionova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |