H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Sabine Lisicki H2H: 0-1
Sabine Lisicki holds a 1–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Lisicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2018 Taipei fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2018* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sabine Lisicki | 6-4 6-1 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Sabine Lisicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 |