H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich H2H: 4-1

Naomi Osaka holds a 4–1 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aliaksandra Sasnovich won the 2025 China Open second round 1-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Belarus Age 32 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aliaksandra Sasnovich #130 1-6 6-4 6-2 Naomi Osaka #14 Match data Sep 27, 2025 R64 China Open WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #1 7-6(3) 2-6 6-2 Aliaksandra Sasnovich #47 Match data Aug 15, 2019* R32 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #1 6-2 6-3 Aliaksandra Sasnovich #33 Match data May 9, 2019* R16 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Naomi Osaka #19 6-0 6-0 Aliaksandra Sasnovich #33 Match data Sep 2, 2018* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Naomi Osaka #66 6-3 7-6(6) Aliaksandra Sasnovich #107 Match data Sep 24, 2016* QF Pan Pacific Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Aliaksandra Sasnovich #136 #29 1,570 1,893 156 172 47.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Aliaksandra Sasnovich
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2014 2–3 40.0% #144 1,491 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2015 6–6 50.0% #106 1,583 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2016 6–13 31.6% #123 1,562 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2017 12–13 48.0% #87 1,638 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2018 26–20 56.5% #30 1,818 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2019 14–22 38.9% #62 1,670 0 0
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2020 10–9 52.6% #90 1,733 0 0
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,770 0 0
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2022 27–19 58.7% #30 1,771 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2023 16–21 43.2% #90 1,734 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2024 6–9 40.0% #143 1,712 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2025 7–10 41.2% #114 1,693 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2026 4–9 30.8% #136 1,658 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2016 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 12 15 27 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 13 13 26 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2022 17 11 28 60.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 9 13 22 40.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 102 109 211 48.3% 38 43 81 46.9% 16 20 36 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 305/328 of Aliaksandra Sasnovich's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2014 5/5 2.4 5.6 53.8% 62.2% 48.4% 52.7% 33.8% 56.2% 35.5%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2015 3/12 2.0 5.0 69.0% 59.6% 38.4% 44.4% 40.2% 53.7% 40.0%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2016 19/19 2.2 4.9 61.1% 56.0% 37.9% 45.7% 50.7% 48.9% 43.4%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2017 25/25 2.1 4.9 62.7% 61.0% 43.6% 45.7% 45.7% 54.7% 43.2%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2018 45/46 2.9 5.0 63.1% 64.4% 45.2% 48.1% 42.9% 57.3% 43.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 32/36 2.7 4.3 61.1% 61.6% 43.4% 46.8% 42.6% 54.2% 42.1%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2020 19/19 1.5 3.5 66.2% 61.3% 48.0% 57.3% 50.1% 56.2% 45.9%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2021 38/38 1.8 4.0 65.4% 59.3% 44.0% 52.0% 51.0% 53.8% 45.7%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2022 44/46 2.2 3.6 68.1% 62.0% 45.3% 52.8% 53.1% 56.5% 45.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 37/37 2.3 3.8 66.6% 59.4% 43.4% 50.5% 50.2% 54.0% 43.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 15/15 1.7 6.6 64.0% 58.1% 42.6% 52.4% 56.6% 52.3% 44.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 11/17 2.5 4.8 59.3% 63.4% 38.4% 48.7% 34.7% 53.2% 41.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 12/13 1.4 3.1 63.3% 62.8% 40.2% 60.9% 54.8% 54.8% 42.1%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 305/328 2.2 4.3 64.2% 61.0% 43.7% 50.4% 48.1% 54.7% 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2014 1491 100.7 -0.24 -3.47 0.810 46.0% +19 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 — — +0.73
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2015 1584 121.6 +0.12 -0.51 0.864 47.1% +6 — — 48.0% +0.08 3–0 (100%) — — -0.56
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2016 1562 112.6 -4.71 -0.25 0.849 46.2% +3 -67 — 37.8% -1.33 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 -0.86
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2017 1639 120.0 -1.00 +0.47 0.955 48.8% +16 -144 -70 49.2% -0.29 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 104.1 -1.01
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2018 1819 141.3 +0.58 +0.57 1.009 50.1% -2 -272 -174 55.0% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 11–5 (69%) 104.2 -2.03
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1671 137.5 -1.55 -0.39 0.918 47.9% +40 -131 -66 41.4% -0.78 7–8 (47%) 0–1 — -0.99
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2020 1734 129.5 -0.26 +1.90 1.048 51.3% -20 -54 — 50.0% +0.48 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 98.5 +0.51
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2021 1770 135.2 -1.45 +2.11 0.989 49.8% +1 -87 -126 48.8% +0.05 8–8 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 99.1 -0.92
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +2 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2022 1772 144.3 -0.10 +2.90 1.055 51.2% +35 +15 -119 56.1% +0.50 9–10 (47%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -0.17
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1734 132.8 -2.40 +1.49 0.943 48.7% +2 -50 -28 44.7% -0.48 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 96.5 -2.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1712 122.4 -2.54 +0.99 0.936 48.6% -70 +31 — 40.6% -0.56 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 101.5 -0.56
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1693 127.6 -1.15 -0.74 0.876 46.8% -37 +30 +75 37.5% -0.82 5–1 (83%) 3–5 (38%) 102.7 -0.13
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1658 131.2 -1.11 -0.91 0.931 48.9% +21 — — 31.0% -0.69 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.33
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1894 136.3 -1.17 +0.97 0.965 49.2% +9 -72 -75 47.0% -0.24 65–60 (52%) 38–45 (46%) 101.8 -2.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.