H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova H2H: 1-0
Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Karolina Schmiedlova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2019 Roland Garros first round 0-6 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 0-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |