H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Bianca Andreescu H2H: 1-1
Naomi Osaka and Bianca Andreescu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bianca Andreescu leads 1–0 on grass, while Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bianca Andreescu won the 2024 S Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 6-4 3-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2024* | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Bianca Andreescu | 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Bianca Andreescu | #173 | #4 | 5,331 | 2,042 | 107 | 75 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Bianca Andreescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 35–8 | 81.4% | #5 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2021 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #46 | 1,855 | 1 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2022 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,904 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2023 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #95 | 1,780 | 1 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #132 | 1,776 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #228 | 1,727 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,712 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |