H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jil Teichmann holds a 1–0 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2021 Cincinnati Open third round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Naomi Osaka | Match data | Aug 20, 2021* | R16 | Cincinnati Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,179 | 251 | 136 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Jil Teichmann | #175 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 94 | 104 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,902 | 1 | 2 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,047 | 2 | 5 | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,111 | 3 | 6 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 20–8 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,040 | 4 | 7 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,933 | 4 | 7 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #57 | 1,872 | 4 | 7 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,965 | 4 | 8 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 27–11 | 71.1% | #13 | 2,052 | 4 | 8 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #175 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 81.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 25 | 8 | 33 | 75.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 190 | 88 | 278 | 68.3% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 25 | 17 | 42 | 59.5% | — | 50 | 61 | 111 | 45.0% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2014 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 65.3% | 44.8% | 33.6% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 33/33 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 48.3% | 54.8% | 51.5% | 59.9% | 43.8% | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% |
| 19 | 2017 | 40/41 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 67.2% | 45.7% | 45.6% | 46.3% | 57.5% | 40.2% | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% |
| 20 | 2018 | 55/60 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 59.7% | 71.1% | 48.8% | 55.8% | 55.7% | 61.9% | 45.3% | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% |
| 21 | 2019 | 50/53 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 60.2% | 73.1% | 47.9% | 56.3% | 51.0% | 63.1% | 44.4% | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 18/19 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 59.0% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 64.2% | 43.2% | 66.5% | 42.5% | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2021 | 21/28 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 53.5% | 76.2% | 52.2% | 59.4% | 52.6% | 64.9% | 43.6% | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2022 | 22/26 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 51.4% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 61.9% | 44.1% | 62.7% | 41.4% | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% |
| 26 | 2024 | 36/38 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 75.1% | 51.1% | 56.3% | 50.1% | 64.0% | 40.4% | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% |
| 27 | 2025 | 34/46 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 56.9% | 74.7% | 49.3% | 52.5% | 53.6% | 63.5% | 45.2% | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% |
| 28 | 2026 | 37/38 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 58.2% | 72.9% | 49.6% | 52.0% | 47.3% | 63.2% | 42.7% | 2026 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 67.7% | 58.6% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 47.9% | 56.0% | 45.9% |
| Career | — | 350/388 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 56.9% | 72.6% | 48.9% | 54.7% | 50.3% | 62.3% | 43.1% | — | 184/198 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 60.9% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.8% | 46.6% | 56.5% | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1531 | 113.5 | +0.17 | +0.57 | 0.923 | 48.4% | +17 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1509 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1700 | 128.3 | +3.18 | +0.66 | 1.091 | 51.9% | -10 | -101 | — | 60.0% | +0.65 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 101.0 | +0.04 | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1696 | 132.1 | +1.30 | -2.12 | 0.947 | 48.9% | +6 | -84 | -47 | 45.8% | -0.18 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.8 | -1.51 | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1902 | 160.7 | +5.21 | +2.94 | 1.190 | 53.8% | +17 | -236 | -168 | 67.5% | +1.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.8 | -2.09 | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2047 | 154.9 | +5.80 | +1.63 | 1.202 | 53.6% | +30 | -229 | -350 | 68.4% | +1.22 | 17–2 (89%) | 10–4 (71%) | 116.1 | +0.60 | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -95 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2112 | 156.0 | +6.66 | +1.24 | 1.267 | 54.0% | +19 | — | — | 71.7% | +1.61 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–5 (38%) | 103.1 | -0.42 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +83 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2040 | 154.1 | +6.00 | +1.08 | 1.240 | 54.0% | +82 | -235 | — | 72.2% | +1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.5 | -0.04 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1934 | 147.8 | +4.77 | +0.02 | 1.112 | 52.0% | +91 | -156 | — | 57.4% | +0.81 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–2 | — | -0.62 | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +76 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1873 | 146.8 | +5.89 | -1.17 | 1.122 | 52.2% | +76 | -98 | -157 | 56.3% | +0.71 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.1 | -2.05 | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1966 | 153.3 | +4.79 | +1.97 | 1.240 | 54.1% | +59 | -128 | -253 | 65.4% | +1.12 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | 101.6 | +0.92 | 2025 | 1648 | 117.6 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +30 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.29 |
| 28 | 2026 | 2053 | 158.1 | +5.15 | +1.24 | 1.160 | 53.0% | +1 | -104 | -111 | 66.7% | +1.12 | 8–2 (80%) | 7–3 (70%) | 109.0 | -0.80 | 2026 | 1708 | 124.4 | +0.10 | +2.08 | 1.042 | 51.0% | — | +59 | — | 70.6% | +0.94 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.30 |
| Career | — | 2179 | 157.0 | +4.72 | +0.85 | 1.143 | 52.6% | +35 | -157 | -155 | 62.7% | +0.95 | 70–37 (65%) | 48–45 (52%) | 107.0 | -1.65 | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.29 | +0.25 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +5 | +91 | -158 | 49.2% | -0.12 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 7 | 4 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |