H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Qinwen Zheng H2H: 1-2
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2024 Berlin third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2024* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Qinwen Zheng | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| May 15, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Qinwen Zheng | 6-2 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2022* | San Jose | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |