H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Sofia Kenin H2H: 2-1
Naomi Osaka holds a 2–1 lead over Sofia Kenin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2020 Brisbane fourth round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 27
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2020* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1 | Sofia Kenin | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2019* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Sofia Kenin | 6-4 1-6 2-0 (ret.) | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| May 29, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 6-2 7-5 | Sofia Kenin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Sofia Kenin | #106 | #4 | 5,915 | 1,977 | 172 | 150 | 53.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Sofia Kenin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2019 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #14 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #4 | 1,953 | 1 | 5 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2021 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #12 | 1,836 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2022 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #228 | 1,666 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2023 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,791 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,735 | 1 | 5 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2025 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #28 | 1,788 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,665 | 1 | 5 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |