H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 3-2 (incl. walkovers)

Naomi Osaka vs Victoria Azarenka: 3–1 excluding walkovers; 3–2 including 1 walkover. Across 5 main-draw results including walkovers, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2020 US Open final 1-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H including walkovers
3 – 2
5 main-draw results
Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #9 1-6 6-3 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #27 Match data Sep 13, 2020* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Victoria Azarenka #59 (w/o) Naomi Osaka #10 Match data Aug 29, 2020* F Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #1 4-6 7-5 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #43 Match data May 30, 2019* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Naomi Osaka #21 6-0 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #84 Match data May 16, 2018* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Victoria Azarenka #16 6-1 6-1 Naomi Osaka #127 Match data Jan 24, 2016* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 250 137 64.6% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17
25 — — — — — — — 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,051 4 7 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20
29 — — — — — — — 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20
30 — — — — — — — 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21
31 — — — — — — — 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21
32 — — — — — — — 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21
33 — — — — — — — 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21
34 — — — — — — — 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21
35 — — — — — — — 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Victoria Azarenka
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 189 89 278 68.0% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Victoria Azarenka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3%
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Victoria Azarenka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93
27 2025 1960 153.1 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +52 -122 -247 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +0.96 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17
28 2026 2051 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% -3 -102 -109 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.2 -0.78 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +34 -156 -154 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.2 -1.63 — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.