H2H data updated: 2026-11-08 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 1-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2016 Tianjin first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 29 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #42 6-4 6-2 Yaroslava Shvedova #32 Match data Oct 13, 2016* R32 Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #16 #1 7,985 2,178 253 139 64.5% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Yaroslava Shvedova — #25 1,860 1,753 143 177 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Yaroslava Shvedova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,509 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,468 0 1
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,046 2 5 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,667 0 1
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,039 4 7 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,577 0 1
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2012 17–13 56.7% #29 1,690 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,651 0 1
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,648 0 1
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,617 0 1
28 2026 30–13 69.8% #16 2,030 4 7 2016 17–17 50.0% #37 1,708 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 4–10 28.6% #289 1,616 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,605 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–10 9.1% #434 1,497 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2008 4 12 16 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 5 8 13 38.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2026 15 8 23 65.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2016 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 7 7 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 192 91 283 67.8% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 71 109 180 39.4% 47 46 93 50.5% 25 22 47 53.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 355/391 of Naomi Osaka's and 277/318 of Yaroslava Shvedova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2006 3/3 2.3 2.7 45.6% 64.2% 50.7% 16.7% 47.2% 57.7% 46.4%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2007 17/24 2.6 3.4 57.6% 63.5% 44.3% 48.3% 51.3% 54.0% 39.2%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2008 14/19 3.1 2.9 62.5% 60.4% 48.9% 50.9% 42.9% 56.2% 42.2%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2009 33/35 3.5 3.2 60.1% 67.7% 49.4% 54.7% 45.7% 60.4% 44.5%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2010 41/45 3.2 4.4 60.1% 62.0% 43.5% 48.1% 41.2% 54.6% 44.1%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2011 18/19 2.8 3.7 60.4% 60.6% 49.6% 53.0% 52.7% 55.7% 42.9%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2012 26/30 3.2 4.6 60.9% 67.0% 49.4% 56.5% 49.7% 59.9% 47.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 20/25 1.8 5.8 63.5% 60.8% 42.5% 36.3% 50.2% 53.9% 43.7%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2014 30/31 3.7 4.7 67.1% 63.6% 42.8% 54.7% 52.0% 56.6% 43.7%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2015 22/27 3.9 4.1 70.8% 63.1% 53.3% 52.9% 46.3% 60.4% 37.2%
28 2026 42/43 5.8 2.5 58.6% 72.8% 49.3% 54.5% 46.9% 63.1% 42.2% 2016 29/34 3.4 4.0 60.8% 66.9% 44.5% 58.1% 49.7% 57.9% 42.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 14/14 2.3 2.6 63.8% 60.8% 53.3% 43.1% 46.9% 58.1% 37.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 69.4% 50.0% 40.0% 37.5% 16.7% 46.9% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 9/11 2.4 4.4 61.6% 56.6% 34.9% 42.8% 59.3% 48.3% 41.9%
Career — 355/393 5.8 2.4 57.0% 72.6% 48.9% 54.8% 50.2% 62.3% 43.0% — 277/320 3.1 4.0 62.2% 63.5% 46.5% 50.7% 48.0% 56.9% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.6 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2005 1514 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.15
18 2016 1700 133.1 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2006 1509 104.8 -1.22 -0.02 1.098 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — +0.02
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -46 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2007 1492 109.4 -1.46 -3.15 0.852 46.6% +41 +12 +78 41.1% -0.72 5–5 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.09
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2008 1469 115.8 -0.04 -1.88 0.963 48.9% -7 — +123 40.0% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +1.14
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.63 2009 1601 136.8 +3.96 +0.37 1.124 52.2% -58 +30 -5 53.8% +0.55 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 +1.19
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +18 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.43 2010 1667 129.5 -0.25 +0.48 0.973 49.2% -64 +71 -70 48.5% -0.03 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 104.8 +0.55
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2011 1578 115.3 -0.34 -1.96 0.967 49.3% +3 +73 -4 36.8% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 -0.35
24 2022 1934 147.9 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2012 1691 136.2 +3.39 +2.47 1.179 53.1% -98 +77 -21 59.7% +0.82 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 99.0 -0.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1652 121.8 -0.93 -0.32 0.946 48.5% -127 +125 — 47.2% -0.15 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.25
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2014 1648 124.3 +0.44 +0.21 1.008 50.2% -84 +43 +123 50.0% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 -0.21
27 2025 1959 153.2 +4.80 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +53 -121 -236 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +1.00 2015 1618 122.7 +0.99 -2.74 0.940 49.0% -34 +57 +132 51.6% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 6–6 (50%) 99.3 -0.26
28 2026 2030 160.5 +5.25 +0.70 1.144 52.8% -2 -84 -90 66.3% +1.11 9–3 (75%) 9–4 (69%) 109.8 -1.00 2016 1709 136.5 +1.33 -0.04 1.010 50.4% +5 -101 +66 51.4% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 -0.15
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1616 115.6 +1.03 -2.59 0.886 47.4% +14 -16 — 37.5% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.1 -0.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1605 100.0 -0.65 -0.84 0.671 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1498 103.6 -3.87 -0.08 0.810 45.2% -12 +76 — 13.6% -2.86 1–1 2–0 — +0.48
Career — 2179 158.0 +4.73 +0.79 1.142 52.6% +34 -153 -147 62.7% +0.95 71–38 (65%) 50–46 (52%) 107.7 -1.65 — 1754 131.8 +0.75 -0.43 0.991 49.7% -38 +48 +43 47.4% -0.12 43–60 (42%) 39–42 (48%) 96.3 +0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.