H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 0-1

Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Vikhlyantseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2018 Eastbourne Open round of 64 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natalia Vikhlyantseva
Russia Age 29 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Su-Wei Hsieh #52 7-6(4) 6-2 Natalia Vikhlyantseva #106 Match data Jun 25, 2018 R64 Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Natalia Vikhlyantseva #1,034 #54 1,070 1,686 34 56 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natalia Vikhlyantseva Su-Wei Hsieh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0
18 2015 1–2 33.3% #237 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2016 1–2 33.3% #132 1,585 0 0 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0
20 2017 15–16 48.4% #56 1,647 0 0 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0
21 2018 5–19 20.8% #134 1,567 0 0 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0
22 2019 9–10 47.4% #115 1,626 0 0 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0
23 2020 0–1 0.0% #145 1,575 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0
24 2021 3–5 37.5% #195 1,543 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0
25 2022 0–1 0.0% #382 1,476 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Natalia Vikhlyantseva Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2017 10 9 19 52.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2018 2 8 10 20.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 16 29 45 35.6% 11 19 30 36.7% 7 8 15 46.7% — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/90 of Natalia Vikhlyantseva's and 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Natalia Vikhlyantseva Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2015 3/3 4.7 5.3 57.6% 66.8% 39.7% 54.5% 48.4% 54.8% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 3/3 3.3 4.0 61.8% 68.8% 42.5% 39.3% 46.8% 58.6% 40.8% 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9%
20 2017 30/31 3.2 3.8 61.4% 66.1% 45.6% 56.5% 47.6% 57.8% 42.1% 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5%
21 2018 22/24 2.6 4.1 62.1% 62.5% 43.8% 52.1% 41.2% 55.1% 40.2% 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9%
22 2019 19/19 1.5 5.7 61.9% 65.1% 46.0% 61.8% 52.2% 57.8% 44.0% 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4%
23 2020 1/1 1.0 8.0 59.2% 61.9% 48.3% 50.0% 25.0% 56.3% 39.7% 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1%
24 2021 8/8 1.6 8.0 59.1% 62.9% 37.0% 54.6% 49.3% 52.8% 46.4% 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8%
25 2022 1/1 2.0 6.0 59.5% 50.0% 33.3% 20.0% 20.0% 43.2% 35.0% 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5%
Career — 87/90 2.5 4.8 61.3% 64.5% 44.0% 55.2% 46.6% 56.4% 42.2% — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Natalia Vikhlyantseva Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23
18 2015 1500 106.1 -1.22 +0.71 0.886 47.9% +20 — — 37.5% -0.75 1–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 1585 110.1 +1.88 -1.70 0.986 49.6% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.10 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
20 2017 1648 124.3 +1.14 -1.22 0.998 50.0% +5 -174 +30 48.5% +0.01 3–5 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +0.61 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03
21 2018 1568 117.8 -1.37 -1.37 0.894 47.8% +20 -72 +61 28.3% -1.19 0–5 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 91.0 -1.34 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15
22 2019 1626 125.8 -0.20 +0.37 1.042 51.2% -7 -45 +34 50.0% +0.33 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.34 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39
23 2020 1575 106.6 -0.44 +0.12 0.910 47.7% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.30 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39
24 2021 1543 101.7 -1.92 +0.59 0.983 49.5% — +35 — 42.1% -0.31 1–2 (33%) — — +0.47 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03
25 2022 1477 94.3 -2.22 -0.26 0.617 39.0% — — — — — — — — +0.20 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1686 120.5 -0.18 -0.67 0.968 49.4% +7 -58 +38 41.9% -0.33 8–19 (30%) 5–12 (29%) 89.4 +0.43 — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.