H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Ons Jabeur vs Sabine Lisicki H2H: 0-1
Sabine Lisicki holds a 1–0 lead over Ons Jabeur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Lisicki leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2012 London Olympics second round 4-6 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012* | London Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Grass | Sabine Lisicki | 4-6 6-0 7-5 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,106 | 222 | 154 | 59.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,921 | 208 | 173 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ons Jabeur | Sabine Lisicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,878 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #37 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,860 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2021 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #10 | 1,969 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,548 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,830 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 |