H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Elena-Gabriela Ruse H2H: 2-1
Paula Badosa holds a 2–1 lead over Elena-Gabriela Ruse in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Paula Badosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2025 Roland Garros second round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2025 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 4-6 6-1 7-6(8) | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2022* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 171 | 112 | 60.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,876 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |